CNHT eBlast 03/31/2006

Filed Under Assessing, CNHT eBlasts | Comments Off

March 31, 2006 Avitar Associates of New England, Inc. A Municipal Services Company

Betsy Patten, Chair Assessing Standards Board
c/o NH Dept of Revenue Admin
P.O. Box 457 Concord, NH 03302

Attn: Dawn Calley
Re: Resignation

Dear Betsy:

I am writing as I have officially submitted my resignation to Tom Holmes, President of the NHAAO, as they are the parties responsible for my nomination.

I have thoroughly enjoyed working as a member of the ASB until recently. It appears the original focus of the Board is lost. Previously, the Board ran like a well-oiled machine, yet lately that is not the case. I believe this is due to the recent amount of media attention focused on assessing issues, ie: “The View Tax”. The ASB is now merely a public/DRA/political forum.

I was astounded at the last meeting, when DRA members, not on the ASB were the driving force behind the decision-making. On several occasions, you specifically asked Scott Dickman whether something should remain or not. There was not enough Board discussion or voting. I believe I am not alone in the concerns I have mentioned.

My prior two terms were excellent and knowing and working with you was a pleasure. I believe an ASB meeting is not the proper forum for taxpayers to bring their specific abatement or appeals to. Taxpayers should be urged to follow the established processes in place, ie: abatement, appeal to BTLA or Superior Court. By lending an ear to taxpayer specific concerns, you have essentially changed the original intent of the Board, while only hearing one tainted side. “

I have not notified the Governor or Governor’s Council, as I did not have their support anyway.

Betsy, it has been a pleasure knowing and working with you, but our current push to adopt USPAP and the forum in which we are doing it is uncomfortable for me, particularly where it is directed at assessing companies.

Sincerely,
Gary J. Roberge, Sr. Appr., CNHA CEO
GJR/sjc

150 Suncook Valley Hwy • Chichester, NH 03258 • (603) 798-4419

Our Northern Office: P.O. Box 307, Milan, NH 03588 (603) 449-2400

Good riddance Mr. Roberge. Don’t let the door…well you know the rest.

Since Gary Roberge, once the all powerful creator of assessing laws, is so fond of “letting it all hang out” about how the Assessing Standards Board has changed its purpose, maybe he can take some time to explain why his Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal software (well oiled machine) has so many flaws in it.

Here is my guess:

The DRA is desperate for some uniform software that can be used to asses all the property in NH. Gary Roberge seemed to be their savior when he came up with his Avitar system. The problem is that it has so many flaws it is unworkable without a constant effort to “re-engineer” it. That “re-engineering” comes at the expense of any town that was dependent on (and paid for) the Avitar system of mass reappraisal.

From sitting through Board of Tax and Land Appeals hearings and watching the way Roberge gets to walk away from bad assessments it occurred to me that he was receiving special treatment.

Then came the political heat from the “View Tax” and Gary is no longer beyond criticism. I remember writing an article not long ago hoping Gov. Lynch would reappoint Roberge to the Assessing Standards Board so Lynch could be tagged with the “View Tax.” Hmmmm.

I hope the efforts of The Coalition of NH Taxpayers in connecting the various selectmen and taxpayers all over this state effected by poor assessing helped bring about this change because if it did it was well worth it, and just a start.

Ed Naile, CNHT

Voters chose the first Saturday in March for the Annual School Budget Meeting.

Saturday won out over Friday with 299 votes to 184 for Friday

Voters chose Saturdays over Fridays in a decisive vote on Tuesday March 14, 2006. The final count of 299 to 184 made it clear that the School Board’s arbitrary decision to ignore the citizens advice of 1981 was unpopular.

In 1981 taxpaying citizens advised the board in Article V of the annual budget meeting that they wanted future annual budget meetings to be held on the 1st Saturday, traditionally in the morning, in March. But in 1996 the board arbitrarily set meeting day and hour to Friday at 6:30 pm. This decision was not only unpopular but detrimental to encouraging full voter participation, because it tended to disenfranchise senior citizens and deter working families from attending an end-of-the work week meeting. But the night time meetings attracted voters with vested interests and led to lop-sided voting on teacher salary raises because of lower voter turnout.

The Plainfield Taxpayers Coalition requested the School Board to offer everyone a chance to express their preference for Saturday or Friday night meetings. You see the results above. Let us watch to be sure the 1st Saturdays in March are not ignored again.